Epic stupidity. Why would anyone walk up and challenge an officer on a traffic stop?

WATCH: State Trooper puts idiot protesters in their PLACE after they claim racial profiling!

Here’s a great video for you to enjoy.

A state trooper in Arizona confronted a protester for approaching one of his officers while in a traffic stop. He gave the female with the video camera fair warning that if she ever did that again he would arrest her.

And that’s when it got good:

Caleb Hull


Person: “That individual is being racially profiled for being brown.”

Police Officer: “Wow, you are about as ignorant as I’ve ever met. Oh my God, go do something else. Go have fun. It’s Friday night, man. Don’t be such an idiot. Put that on your website.”

11K people are talking about this

Aside from the necessity of border security, I can think of at least 100 billion taxpayer funded reasons to build a fence and close the border

Most illegal immigrants in US receive government benefits, costing taxpayers billions: experts

This week, the U.S. Supreme Court considers whether to count self-identified illegal immigrants in the 2020 census. Cities worry adding the citizenship question could undercount 6.5 million people. Their argument, however, isn’t just about political power but billions of dollars in federal funds states expect.

The case underscores what experts say is a growing cost to taxpayers from the surge of Central American families and unaccompanied minors.

“We’re talking about billions of dollars in taxpayer benefits over the next few years,” said Dan Stein, director of the right-leaning think tank, Federation for American Immigration Reform. “The payout for the taxpayer is enormous and income to the Treasury is miniscule.”

A FAIR study in 2017 found illegal immigrants are a net consumer of taxpayer benefits worth more than $100 billion a year, not including the cost of enforcing the border.

While federal benefits are supposed to be off limits, in practice many are not. More than 25,000 undocumented workers receive subsidized housing, according to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Children receive free education and most qualify for English lessons and free school breakfast and lunch.


Illegal immigrants do not qualify for Obamacare but under federal law, hospitals and clinics are required to provide urgent medical care without regard to legal status. Pregnant women are entitled to prenatal and postpartum care under the Women, Infants and Children program. Infant delivery costs are paid for by Medicaid. A study in the Journal of the American Medical Association found a federal-state immigrant insurance program cost $2 billion a year in emergency treatment, not including the $1.24 billion in infant delivery expenses.

Illegal immigrants are not entitled to food stamps, but families with U.S.-born children are. According to the Center for Immigration Studies, 31% of such families use the SNAP program and more than 50% of Central American families in the U.S. use at least one welfare program.

This is especially true of asylum seekers said Art Arthur, a former immigration judge now with the Center for Immigration Studies, an immigration think tank. Arthur said because there is a three to five year lag time between apprehension and court appearance, young asylum seekers put down roots, allowing many to access programs they are initially unaware or afraid to use.

“You’re going to buy a house, get a job, have kids,” he said. “So their entire life changes, and that means their claim changes. Because of a lack of a bright line for immigration judges, appeals are endless and people don’t leave.”

Recognizing that many illegal workers fill jobs communities need, 26 states offer them *state-funded* benefits. New York state offers up to $300 a month in cash assistance. Eleven states offer free or subsidized medical and hospital care. California offers food stamps, legal services and benefits for those over 65 or disabled. Gov. Gavin Newsom recently asked for an extra $50 million from lawmakers to serve the state’s illegal immigrant population.


Such sanctuary states and immigrant-friendly cities are an obvious draw, but others say it is all about finding work not using benefits.

The Current Population Survey conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau in 2018 found Central American families may struggle financially in the U.S. but they work (76%) at high rates than native-born Americans (73%).

“At the end of the day people are going to go where their jobs are, not necessarily where the services are,” said Ali Noorani, director of the National Immigration Forum. “So yes, 26 states may provide state-funded access to public benefits. But if those states don’t have a growing economy and don’t have jobs that are open immigrants, much as anybody else, they’re not going to see them.”

Up to 70% of immigrants apprehended at the border this fiscal year are families or unaccompanied minors claiming asylum. Unlike other border crossers, after six months asylum seekers qualify for work permits and most taxpayer subsidies. But because most are unskilled and uneducated, they earn minimum wage or less.

Almost half, according to the census survey, never finished high school. They earn 40% less than U.S.-born workers and about 50% of families live in poverty, requiring community support for food and cash for necessities. Some have sponsors, but most are usually immediate families that are not much better off.

“There is a cost for communities for sure,” Sen. Martha McSally, R-Ariz., said last week outside a Salvation Army shelter in Yuma. “Whether it is in uncompensated care in hospitals or the education system in different ways. It has never really been measured, but it is very real.”


Advocates for illegal immigrants argue most studies are flawed because they do not account for their economic contribution to the economy as a whole. Not just because they perform jobs Americans won’t, but studies don’t account for their lower wage differential that produces cost savings to U.S. consumers.

“We need an immigration system that treats the American taxpayer fairly,” Noorani said. “Right now, our immigration system doesn’t treat the American taxpayer fairly and I would argue it really treats nobody fairly. At the federal level, what the Congress and the president need to do is work together to create an immigration system that is fair to the taxpayer and 10 or 11 million people who are undocumented.”

U.S. officials expect a million additional illegal immigrants this fiscal year, as the Border Patrol is currently apprehending up to 4,000 a day. Most will claim asylum, entitling them to government benefits.

Its not debt relief for the taxpayer that will bear the burden of paying for it and all her wondrous socialist programs.

Elizabeth Warren Proposes $640 Billion Student Debt Relief

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) speaks at the National Press Club August 21, 2018 in Washington, DC. Warren spoke on ending corruption in the nation's capital during her remarks. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)
Win McNamee/Getty Images



Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) proposed Monday a new $640 billion student college debt relief program that would also eliminate college tuition for all two and four-year public colleges.

The 2020 Democrat presidential candidate unveiled the ambitious policy proposal as she attempts to distinguish herself from the large and progressive Democrat field. Warren released the proposal ahead of a series of youth-oriented CNN town halls Monday night with 2020 presidential candidates at Saint Anselm College in New Hampshire.

“It’s a problem for all of us,” Warren noting, that student college debt has reached more than $1.5 trillion and affects more than 40 million Americans. “It’s reducing home ownership rates. It’s leading fewer people to start businesses. It’s forcing students to drop out of school before getting a degree.”

Warren’s plan, which would cost roughly $640 billion, would eliminate up to $50,000 in student debt for each person with less than $100,000 in household income. The Massachusetts senators’ plan would also lower college debt for those making incomes between $100,000 and $250,000 but at a more gradual rate. Americans with household income over $250,000 would not receive student debt relief.

Sen. Warren would then eliminate tuition and fees fro all two-year and four-year public colleges as a means to restructure the higher education system to ensure that Americans do not accumulate more college debt.

“Once we’ve cleared out the debt that’s holding down an entire generation of Americans, we must ensure that we never have another student debt crisis again,” the senator suggested.

Sen. Warren’s latest proposal serves as part of a broader strategy to distinguish herself from the growing list of progressive Democrats running for president, especially as many of them already agree on leftist proposals such as the Green New Deal and Medicare for All. Warren also lags behind Democrat front-runners former Vice President Joe Biden and Sanders in the polls as well.

Warren has called on the Senate to abolish the 60-vote filibuster Senate rule and the electoral college; the senator even endorsed legislation to study potential reparations for slavery.

Warren proposed an “ultra-millionaire tax” that would annually tax wealth above $50 million at an extra two percent with an additional one percent tax on wealth over $1 billion.

In March, Sen. Warren called to break up some of America’s largest tech companies, including Google, Facebook, and Amazon.

Faiz Shakir, an executive at the ACLU, said in January that Warren has tried to position herself as the “ideas candidate.”

“Others should start thinking about competing in the arena for new ideas,” Shakir said.

In Warren’s Medium post announcing her college debt-relief program, she touted how higher education has “opened a million doors for” her, despite that she exaggerated her Native American heritage to obtain entrance to Harvard Law School.

“It’s how the daughter of a janitor in a small town in Oklahoma got to become a teacher, a law school professor, a U.S. Senator, and eventually, a candidate for President of the United States,” Warren said.

Sean Moran is a congressional reporter for Breitbart News. Follow him on Twitter @SeanMoran3.

They come here for love….right Jeb?

Charges: 19-year-old driver was drunk at time of fatal St. Paul crash

The young El Salvadoran entered the country illegally at age 15 in 2016 and was ordered deported seven months later, according to an ICE spokesman.

A 19-year-old man has been charged with felony drunken driving for striking another car in St. Paul last week and killing the other driver, according to charges.

Jose O. Vasquez-Guillen, of St. Paul, was charged Wednesday in Ramsey County District Court with criminal vehicular homicide in connection with the crash on April 3 south of the St. Paul Downtown Airport near Concord and Page streets. Mark J. O’Gara, 52, of St. Paul, died at the scene.

Two days after the crash, Vasquez-Guillen left the Ramsey County jail and was arrested by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

Vasquez-Guillen, a citizen of El Salvador, entered the country illegally at age 15 in January 2016, and a federal judge seven months later ordered him deported, ICE spokesman Shawn Neudauer said Thursday. The deportation order came after Vasquez-Guillen failed to appear for his immigration hearing.

Read the entire story here:  http://www.startribune.com/charges-19-year-old-allegedly-in-u-s-illegally-drunk-at-time-of-fatal-st-paul-crash/508433412/

There’s a whole lot of butt hurt media today…and yes, I think its funny. Its what happens when you have an agenda and let facts get in the way.

MSNBC’s Nicolle Wallace exploded in the aftermath of Attorney General Bill Barr’s press conference Thursday morning. Wallace’s mental condition visibly deteriorated during the course one particularly impassioned rant, in which she smeared Barr as “shill” and a “human shield” for the President, until she was reduced to repeatedly crying, “Why? Why?”

The grief-stricken Deadline: White House host began her tirade with a number of accusations at the President: “As the country’s chief executive, he sat in his pajamas watching Fox & Friends maligning the FBI, maligning Robert Mueller, maligning Rod Rosenstein.”

She then turned her ire to Barr: “And what the country’s Attorney General did was walk in there and back up the guy doing the kicking.”

“Why?” She demanded. “Why?”



Her colleague, veteran MSNBC reporter Brian Williams inquired, “Do you have an answer for that?”

“I don’t” she replied, visibly exasperated. After questioning the legitimacy of the President’s having appointed Barr to begin with, Wallace reached a crescendo:

There will be a strong wave of trying to bully the press, saying, “It’s over! It’s over! No collusion, no obstruction.” Really? Then why did that all happen today? Why have we heard from Barr five times if the Mueller report is so awesome for Donald Trump? We have now heard from someone who is a human shield of Mueller’s findings five times. If Mueller exonerated Trump on collusion, if there’s nothing ugly in there, why have we heard from Barr five times?

Nepotism and hypocrisy in government? Tell me it isn’t so…


IRRR Decision to Hire DFL Radinovich Raises Questions

Ryan Juntti
Updated: April 18, 2019 12:41 PM

The IRRR agency (Iron Range Resources and Rehabilitation) is coming under fire for how it came to hire former DFL Eighth District Congressional candidate Joe Radinovich. The agency is being accused by some lawmakers of disregarding the hiring process when they hired Radinovich over a potentially more qualified candidate.

The Timberjay Newspaper broke the story Wednesday, and is reporting that Radinovich was hired in March to a position that IRRR officials made specifically for him, and that the job postion was posted for only one day.  Agency officials are reportedly disputing the complaints–saying the hiring process was fair. The Governor’s office told the newspaper the situation has prompted an ordered change in the state hiring process

The Timberjay story says Radinovich’s position is permanent, and pays a salary of $100,000 a year.

The story says the position is supposed to be “nonpolitical and is subject to state hiring guidelines… Read the entire story here: https://www.wdio.com/news/irrrb-decision-radinovich-/5321168/?cat=10335

I’m no doctor, but I think Duluth’s mayor is missing the fries from her happy meal.

There is an old saying about being a couple fries short but I think Emily Larson is a frigging moonbat.  If you’ve not read or heard her “State of the City’ address, you should.  You can read the article here:


According to the DNT, she spoke of disparity in “affordable housing”.  Maybe, just maybe, if the welfare crowd she supports in Duluth would get off their asses and get a job instead of section 8 vouchers, they might find “affordable housing”.  Affordable would be defined as what one could afford, right?  If you count on someone else to pay for your penthouse and it isn’t paid for by your voucher, does that make it unaffordable?  To solve the problem, she suggests creating another government job and hire a new “housing development position”.  I’m sure crazy Bernie would love to have Emily on staff.

Emily spoke of “increased child care options”  What does that mean?  It means she wants the taxpayers to pay more daycare for women that can’t help getting knocked up by worthless men that don’t want to pay for their kids they helped create.  Good grief, if you can’t afford kids, stay on your feet or spend ten bucks a month for the pill.

Jobs.  She spoke of “African American and Native Americans’ being unemployed in Duluth.  Someone needs to tell them to get off their ass and get a job.  I’ve seen “help wanted” ads or postings at many, many businesses and in my eyes, the only reason they aren’t working is because they don’t want to.  This really isn’t rocket science.

Fourth topic is “climate change”.  She wants to reduce the city’s carbon emissions by 80%.  Really?  Does the mayor really believe a city of 86,000 people can really make any impact on any aspect of Al Gore’s creation of the phony notion accepted as “global warming”.  Come on,, really?

Why not concentrate on issues like bussing in bums to try to justify building more public housing, fixing the damn streets, privatizing the golf courses, zoo, all the frigging special projects the left wants?  What about running a city to provide basic services like fire, cops, streets, water, sewer, and the like?  Why does she want to run the city like a social experiment?  Because she’s a SOCIALIST.  Figure it out.



Its funny how the loons on the left don’t want their policies enacted when it negatively affects them.

Trump doubles down on plan to ship migrants to sanctuary cities, says ‘Radical Left’ should be happy

President Trump responded to reports Friday that his administration proposed releasing immigrant detainees in sanctuary cities by not only confirming the plan but saying it remains under “strong” consideration.

Further, the president tweeted that relocating illegal immigrants to these districts should make the “Radical Left” happy.

The comments came after The Washington Post first reported that the White House proposed sending the detainees to sanctuary cities twice in the last six months. The proposal was first floated in November amid reports of a large migrant caravan from Central America making its way to the southern border. The idea was again considered in February, amid the standoff with Congress over a border wall.


The Post said the plan was shot down both times. But on Friday, Trump signaled the proposal isn’t dead.

“Due to the fact that Democrats are unwilling to change our very dangerous immigration laws, we are indeed, as reported, giving strong considerations to placing Illegal Immigrants in Sanctuary Cities only,” Trump tweeted.

Cartoon County’s tractor.

Well kids, I finally got my hands on a picture of the hour meter of the county tractor that our extension agent has been using and I find it remarkable that there doesn’t appear to be any accountability for the hours piled on a $96,000 tractor.

From the dealerships I spoke to, there really isn’t a way to figure value of the hours he’s used it , but someone should be paying for it…and not the taxpayers.  Auction prices for this model range from between 25 K and 50 K, so…you do the math.

Why should cartoon county taxpayers subsidize use of county property for personal use?  Seems nonsensical to me.


And these politicians all think they’re so smart.


Virginia Kruta | Associate Editor

Democratic California Rep. Maxine Waters challenged bank executives during a Wednesday morning hearing, appearing to blame them for the student debt crisis.

What she appeared to leave out was the fact that student loans were nationalized nearly a decade ago under former President Barack Obama to cut banks’ ability to offer government-backed loans.

“By cutting out the middleman, we’ll save the American taxpayers $68 billion in the coming years,” Obama said when he signed the legislation in 2010. “That’s real money.”

Waters now chairs the committee that oversees those student loans.


Waters began by explaining the student debt crisis, saying, “Today, there are more than 44 million Americans that owe … $1.56 trillion in student loan debt.”